INDEFINITE CIVIL STRIKE FOR THE DIGNITY OF LA GUAJIRA STARTING ON AUGUST 28

INDEFINITE CIVIL STRIKE FOR THE DIGNITY OF LA GUAJIRA STARTING ON AUGUST 28 

As a result of the implementation of a mining and energy model of extraction of natural resources through multinational companies, the peasants and different sectors in La Guajira live a crisis whose most sinister aspects include the enormous and ever growing social inequality, which measured through the Gini coefficient, has risen from 047 in 2002 to 061 in 2010; the low coverage of aqueduct (51.64%) and sewerage (38.96%); the Index Unsatisfied Basic Needs (UBN) of 65.23%; and the chronic malnutrition of 27% making it one of the highest rates in the country.

Given the above, the Civic Committee for the Dignity of La Guajira, at its meeting today, July 22, made ​​the following determinations: 

1. to request the National Government, the departmental government, and multinational companies to form a single table for negotiation to discuss the demands that includes the aspirations of the people of La Guajira. 

2. To invite the Guajiro people to join for an indefinite general departmental strike starting on August 28 of this year

3. The following Tuesday July 29, a meeting will discuss the organizational aspects for the development of a plan leading to link large sections and sectors in this strike.

CENTRAL POINTS OF THE LIST OF REQUESTS FOR THE SALVATION AND DIGNITY OF LA GUAJIRA TO BE DISCUSSED WITH THE GOVERNMENT AND MULTINATIONAL COMPANY CERREJON

1. The creation of a fund for development and Compensation for the dignity of the Guajira, by which the Colombian state and the multinational companies exploiting natural resources in La Guajira will pay the huge social debt to the different social and ethnic groups in La Guajira as a result of the immense and irreversible environmental, social, economic and cultural impacts. This fund will also ensure the compensation of future impacts on the Guajira people, as it should be done with the social responsibility programs arising from the exploitation of non-renewable natural resources. 

2.- The creation of a plan for management of natural resources to ensure sustainable development (its conservation, restoration or replacement) and, thus, preventing and controlling environmental deterioration by being able to impose legal sanctions and claims when demages have occurred.

3.- Plan and fund for the promotion of productive projects based on agriculture, industry, water management, and tourism in order to generate productive employment and ensure food sovereignty in the department. 

4. Improve the quality of life of the communities in La Guajira so that the wealth generated by the exploitation of natural resources be shared with all those social sectors through jobs, quality public services, food, health, education and housing 

5. To request thr Colombian State to guarantee democracy and the full use of public rights and freedoms for peasants and other social and ethnic sectors in La Guajira

The Real Costs of Public Protest (from an industrial and business perspective)

June 26, 2014

A May 2014 joint report from the University of Queensland Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining and the Harvard Kennedy School confirms the real costs of public opposition to development.

Researchers analysed over fifty mining, oil and gas projects in India, Chile, Peru, Australia and Argentina to examine and total the costs of public opposition to their businesses. The results were staggering but not unexpected from industries often faced with costly cancellations and delays caused by public objection.

"There is a popular misconception that local communities are powerless in the face of large corporations and governments," according to key study contributor Dr. Daniel Franks.

Franks asserts that this sentiment is false and concludes that the study's findings "show that community mobilization can be very effective at raising the costs to companies."

The study points out that project delays resulted in the most frequent source of costs to companies, with approximately $20 million per week wasted for mining projects valued between $3 billion and $5 billion.

However, project suspensions caused the most overall economic damage. One example the study referenced is a gold and copper mine established in Peru by the Newmont Mining Corporation. The mine, known as the Conga project, aimed to extract 350,000 ounces of gold and 120 million pounds of copper from Peru's Cajamarca region annually.

But after some initial investments in the $5 billion project were made, local residents grew increasingly concerned that the mine could have negative effects on water quality in the area. Citizens' concerns eventually lead to a series of protests that escalated into violence and a government order to halt all work at the mine. Two years later, the mine remains closed, leaving Newmont with a
$2 billion loss on the investment.

Switching to an industry-wide perspective, in 2012 Swiss financial firm Credit Suisse found "environmental, social and governance risks" across the Australian mining, oil and gas sector to be worth $8 billion.

According Dr. Frank, this level of risk could be negated if companies focus more on investment in risk mitigation at the outset of projects rather than acting retroactively. Franks argues that companies should focus on "meaningful"
dialogue at the outset of a project and that this attempt to reach out "is something that the best practice companies are doing at the moment, and something that the International Council for Mining and Metals argues that companies should be doing."

Contributor Rachel Davis of the Harvard Kennedy School's Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative notes that "it is much harder for a company to repair its relationship with a local community after it has broken down; relationships cannot be 'retro-fitted.'"

What is the best course of action for companies going forward then? While there may not be one perfect formula, companies can start by taking a few important steps to formulate a strategy that minimizes public opposition.

Starting early

Strive to create an open environment for dialogue. Even if opposition appears limited, it only takes a few angry voices to change the atmosphere into one of intimidation and disapproval. Local residents may want a development to succeed, but not at the cost of angering their neighbors. Therefore, the moment a project is internally approved, project managers must have an infrastructure for communication ready, both on the ground and in cyberspace. This way, rapid communication to build an advocacy network can take place by the time opposition starts. Receptive citizens will then have the resources necessary to receive information and voice approval.

Reaching out

Those with new mining proposals must engage residents as their new neighbors by creating a dialogue and allowing residents to develop a sense of familiarity with the company coming to town. Successful projects inform and educate the community using a variety of communication vehicles, including phone calls, direct mailing, press conferences and releases, and open house information sessions. People are invested in their communities; they want to be informed and to know the assets and drawbacks a project will bring. If developers neglect to inform them, opposition groups will.

Furthermore, some locals may have very legitimate concerns that require in-depth answers. It is paramount that these concerns are answered in plain and direct language from the company itself. Rather than ignoring a citizen's complaint, engage the resident even if a solution is not immediately feasible.

Keeping in touch

Companies must also build a database of supporters and call upon them.

Supporters want the success of the development, and they will help if asked. Let both advocates and the community know about the status of a project - where it is doing well and where it needs help. A few supportive voices at a town meeting will make a significant difference.

Additionally, social media cannot be neglected. Creative content that can be shared easily is an important digital dialogue facilitator.

Staunch opposition will never tire out in its public outreach, and neither can those putting forth the proposal.

Turning local support into legislative support

Finally, supporters must be made aware that success at the local level can be overturned at the state level.

Teach supporters how to engage most effectively with their local and state elected officials through the platforms upon which officials most frequently engage.

Make sure that every mining project is accompanied by a grassroots advocacy campaign that will keep the project popular both with locals and state governments. Politicians will be much more likely to stand behind the industry if it is backed by voting constituents.

With a strong local and legislative advocacy network built by an active grassroots campaign, mining projects will reduce the risk of project delays that can cost millions.

http://www.mining.com/web/the-real-costs-of-public-protest/?utm_source=digest-en-mining-140625&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=digest

People of the Guajira Endorse The Civic Committee for Dignity in the Guajira's Call for a Civic Strike

Today, on May 1, International Workers' Day, workers, peasants, students, teachers, Wayuu indigenous people, community leaders, municipal officials, people displaced by the Cerrejón mine, and women took the streets in La Guajira's capital, calling out "Yes to the Civic Strike, They are calling us to strike, we will!" which referred to the calling of the civic strike by various civil society organizations, grouped under the Civic Committee for Dignity in the Guajira.

 

The application of the extractive mining and gas model, the opening of the economy, and cuts to public spending have led to the worst crisis in our department's history. The crisis is in the rising inequality: the Gini coefficient has risen from 0.47 in 2002 to 0.61 in 2010; the loss of food security; 28 % of territory in mining concession; the decline of the peasant economy.   The statistics reflect this great social tragedy: 51.64 % of the region has low aqueduct access and 38.96 % low sewer system access, 65.23 % of people do not meet Basic Needs and 27 % suffer from chronic malnutrition, one of the highest rates in the country.   

 

La Guajira has become one of zones with major energy resources with over 3 billion tons of coal, 60 % of the country's natural gas and produces 560 MW of electricity to meet national demand.  

 

But these riches are not exploited to meet the development needs of the department or bring progress to the people.  While multinational corporations obtain operational utilities of 37.7 %, 60 % of people in the Guajira earn less that 200 thousand pesos ($100 USD) per month and 38 % makes less than 90 thousand pesos ($45).

 

Mining, which makes up 61% of GDP, generates only 2.9 % of employment in La Guajira. That is to say, the jobs lost in agriculture have not been made up in mining employment.  Unemployment in 2010 rose to 9.2 % from 5.7 % in 2005, and insufficient employment rose to 122 thousand people.

 

Our natural water sources are low, and in 12 municipalities, very low, and there is high and very high water vulnerability in 33% of the same areas. Coal mining has aggravated the problem, destroying natural aquifers in 8 water bodies including ravines and tributary streams of the Ranchería River and has affected 11, 488 hectares of forest.  The mine has only rehabilitated about 3000 hectares of this land.

 

Civil society organizations grouped under the Civic Committee for the Guajira have called for all social sectors: civic, trade, institutional and political leadership to organize a department-wide civic strike.  The Civic Committee for Dignity in La Guajira will lead the strike with participation from municipal committees and other organizations and sectors who want to participate in the strike.

 

The Civic Committee for Dignity will prepare a letter in the Casa de Nariño, presidential office, on May 7, containing a summary of the list of petitions from 2013, focusing on the most pressing needs of people in the Guajira, and will ask the government to mediate in negotiations with Carbones de Cerrejón and Associación Ecopetrol Chevron Texaco.  On May 15, the Committee will host a meeting between social, union, and community organizations, to approve the civic strike, create a mobilization plan that will include strike committees in every municipality, neighborhood, street, school, university, as well as the plans for marches, rallies, blockades, and longer marches with the different social sectors in order to make the strike successful across the Guajira.

 

The completion of the strike will depend on the National Government, the multinational shareholders of Cerrejón, and the association Ecopetrol Chevron Texaco paying attention and confirming the need for negotiation committees, and their will to resolve the problems from the list of petitions.

 

The Civic Committee for the La Guajira: